Reasonable Doubt The Viewpoint of the Jurors Essay

In the U.S. our system is formulated by various means to construct tweleve fair and unbiased jurors. Whom acording to our text, hypothetically decide cases based on â€Å"burden of proof and reasonable doubt.† These individuals listen and take into account the evidence and testimoneys of witnesses appointed by both the prosecution and defense through the duration of the trial. Though many make a preliminary decision based on the opening statements. Once trial has commenced the jury is dissmissed to the deliberation room. Where disscussion about the elements of the case and the defendents specific actions begin, but jurors usually vote as soon as they retire to jury room and the orginal vote wins the majority of the time. Allowing their own†¦show more content†¦This was before more facts and evidence were indepthly conveyed. Therefore, I would change my vote due to Henry Fonda’s agrument of â€Å"possible but not plausible.† I particually based my decsion on the diagram of the apartment floor plan along with the lady’s statement of hearing a scream during the passing of a L-train. These two I believe prove reasonable doubt. Regarding the film and how I view jurors and the system is diffcult to say. I’ve never been on a jury, but I believe its diffucult to sit aside your own views and look at a cases fairly. Thats why is cruical for the prosectuion to present evidence and testimoneys that leave no room for reasonable doubt. I also believe our system works best based on the courtroom actors, and chances for the defense to appel the verdict. However, the thought its still intemidating to think if I were on trial and were innocent i’d be left up to tweleve individuals to decide wheater or not I was. In conclusion, I really enjoyed the film. I have even considered buying the film. Henry Fonda’s role as a dissenting juror in a murder trial slowly manageing to convince the others that the case is not as obviousl y clear as it seemed in court was supurb. Taking film as a course, made me enjoy the film even more because I paid close attention to the film making aspects also. Filming in one room, for partcality the whole movie was noteablly stressful for the actors, who on screen proformace of yellingShow MoreRelatedAnalysis Of The Movie 12 Angry Men 933 Words   |  4 Pages12 Angry Men, a group of jurors must decide the fate of an inner-city boy, who is charged with killing his father. The case should have been a slam dunk, yet one man (Juror No. 8) in the initial vote cast reasonable doubt over the evidence of the trial. While deliberating their verdict, the details are revealed. Subsequently, the jurors slowly changed their vote to innocent on the basis of doubt. Despite their duty to separate personal matters from the facts, the jurors complicate their decisionsRead More12 Angry Men1257 Words   |  6 Pagesthat were occurring amongst the 12 jurors. The time frame in which this movie takes place is not too different than what we experience today in our judicial system. The major differences today would be we do not discriminate based upon age, race or gender. All three of these factors would influence how the jurors would interact with one another and would eventually have a major impact on the final verdict. Juror 8 was so successful in convincing the other 11 jurors for two simple facts. He demonstratedRead MoreLaw In Action1251 Words   |  6 Pageshas not elected to be eligible for jury service o a person who is not able to read or write the English language o a person who has a physical or mental disability that makes the person incapable of effectively performing the functions of a juror o a person who has been convicted of an indictable offence, whether on indictment or in a summary proceeding o a person who has been sentenced (in the State or elsewhere) to imprisonment. There are three major stakeholders to the jury systemRead MoreUnanimous Verdict vs. Majority Rules Verdicts890 Words   |  3 Pagesof fact. The jury is in a powerful method because ultimately, it determines whether a person is guilty or innocent. In civil cases, the main function of the jury is to find the facts having regard to the evidence, and assess damages. The number of jurors used in a civil trial is less than that used in a criminal trial. Another important difference is that the verdict does not have to be unanimous, meaning that a judge will accept a majority decision of a civil jury. Unanimity has long been consideredRead MoreEssay on Twelve Angry Men (Norms, Roles, Process)1038 Words   |  5 Pagesenforcer of good manners)  · The jurors had come to value a case based on facts, not prejudice or stereotypes. Those who upheld this value (Juror 8 and the Juror 4) were respected and became leaders that were looked to for guidance. The jurors that maintained arguments based on stereotypes alienated themselves from the others.  · The decision has to be unanimous (hung jury was something nobody liked)  · No racial prejudices were tolerated (everybody turned their backs to juror 10 when he started sayingRead MoreEssay about The Right to a Free Trial1542 Words   |  7 Pagesthat a law is unconstitutional, evil, or even unfair they can void it for the circumstance by declaring the defendant not-guilty. The power of the jury is enormous and through time has become more equitable by decreasing the limitations to become a juror including race and sex. Part of the reasoning behind the right to a jury trial is to limit government power. Although judges should be fair and just, total power is too strong, and could be used to aid some people while harming others. As someoneRead MoreSensationalizing Criminal Activity in the Media934 Words   |  4 Pagesproblematic to members of a jury as it can be assumed that the majority of a jury have a distorted view of reality as Jurors are drawn from the community at large, so it is only to be expected that jurors will reflect the general social outlook and values of their communities. (Jurors 24/7, 2014) Greene (2014) wrote about how media coverage of legal issues can greatly influence Juror decision making. She became aware of the potential for influence whilst running a study in Seattle, USA. During theRead MoreMovie Analysis : 12 Angry Men1639 Words   |  7 PagesIn the beginning, all jurors believed the boy to be guilty without a doubt, except for one. Juror 8 continues to raise questions pertaining to the facts presented, while slowly convincing the other jurors to take another look before determining the boy’s fate. Many people would say that their purpose was to determine the guilt or innocence of the defendant, but in reality they have no way of knowing if the teen is innocent; in the end, all they can have is reasonable doubt. Analysis ConstructiveRead MoreThe Film 12 Angry Men903 Words   |  4 Pagesplace, and they are unsure of their decision and start to believe the other argument is more valid. This happened in particular when eleven out of the twelve jurors voted the defendant as guilty on their initial vote, however, their decisions started to drift, one by one, towards the defendant being innocent of killing his father, after juror eight, the architect, presented thought provoking observations. One convincing argument regarding what one of the witnesses purportedly heard the defendant yellRead MoreTwelve Angry Men Essay964 Words   |  4 Pages ·nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Respect elders (e.g., the laborer is the self-appointed enforcer of good manners)  ·nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;The jurors had come to value a case based on facts, not prejudice or stereotypes. Those who upheld this value (Juror 8 and the Juror 4) were respected and became leaders that were looked to for guidance. The jurors that maintained arguments based on stereotypes alienated themselves from the others.  ·nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;The decision has to be unanimous